Mark D. Weber

66 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Mark D. Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Biological Psychiatry 181
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 157
  • Neurology 154
  • Applied Psychology 67
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 61
Replace Dean G. Cruess with:
Dean G. Cruess United States
Robert L. Johnson United States
Nancy L. McCain United States
Mary F. Morrison United States
Steven E. Locke United States
Pariya L. Fazeli United States
Patricia Anne Kinser United States
Roger W. Bartrop Australia
Stephen J. Ferrando United States
Renate Deinzer Germany
Mark D. Weber relative to Dean G. Cruess United States Dean G. Cruess's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Dean G. Cruess · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark D. Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark D. Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark D. Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark D. Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark D. Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark D. Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark D. Weber. The network helps show where Mark D. Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark D. Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark D. Weber Line = papers co-authored together Mark D. Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017309
2 1990250
3 2002132
4 1994104
5 200489
6 200477
7 200477
8 200373
9 198964
10 198943
11 199641
12 200140
13 200738
14 200334
15 202131
16 202127
17 201225
18 201620
19 200520
20 201219

About Mark D. Weber

Mark D. Weber is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 76 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (10 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (6 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (6 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (4 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (181 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (157 citations), Neurology (154 citations), Applied Psychology (67 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (61 citations). Mark D. Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan E. Fielding, Mary Ann Pentz, David P. MacKinnon, Antronette K. Yancey, Brian R. Flay, William B. Hansen, James H. Dwyer, Catherine Johnson, Neal Baer and Vickie M. Mays. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, American Journal of Public Health, Addiction, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Anesthesia & Analgesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact