Steven E. Locke

42 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Steven E. Locke
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 268
  • Biological Psychiatry 139
  • Applied Psychology 213
  • General Health Professions 371
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 195
Replace Frances Cohen with:
Frances Cohen United States
Brian A. Esterling United States
Julie M. Turner‐Cobb United Kingdom
Jane Holliday United States
Pamela J. Feldman United Kingdom
Victoria E. Burns United Kingdom
Tracy B. Herbert United States
Urs Hepp Switzerland
Nancy L. Brodsky United States
Adam W. Carrico United States
Steven E. Locke relative to Frances Cohen United States Frances Cohen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Frances Cohen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven E. Locke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven E. Locke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven E. Locke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven E. Locke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven E. Locke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven E. Locke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven E. Locke. The network helps show where Steven E. Locke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven E. Locke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven E. Locke Line = papers co-authored together Steven E. Locke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984409
2 1984202
3 1992179
4 2003177
5 198294
6 200583
7 201073
8 200553
9 200547
10
Foundations of psychoneuroimmunology
198541
11 199239
12 199036
13 200531
14 198530
15 199427
16 198725
17 199524
18
The Healer Within : The New Medicine of Mind and Body
198624
19 201222
20 198418

About Steven E. Locke

Steven E. Locke is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education, Applied Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (5 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Health and Conflict Studies (3 papers), Blood donation and transfusion practices (3 papers), Disaster Response and Management (3 papers) and Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (268 citations), Biological Psychiatry (139 citations), Applied Psychology (213 citations), General Health Professions (371 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (195 citations). Steven E. Locke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John B. Jemmott, Michael R. Williams, Jane Leserman, Michael W. Hurst, Thomas J. McLaughlin, Onesky Aupont, Bernard J. Ransil, Alain Bitton, Shiraz A. Shah and Maida Sewitch. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Psychosomatic Medicine, Behavioral Medicine, American Journal of Psychiatry and General Hospital Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact