James Day

2.1k citations
44 papers · 1.6k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

James Day

41 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

James Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Condensed Matter Physics 484
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 770
  • Geophysics 323
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 224
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 140
Replace Kousuke Nakano with:
Kousuke Nakano Japan
M. Akhavan Iran
W. W. Simmons United States
Shannon M. Thompson United States
Paul Grant United States
Edward L. Cochran United States
J. R. Groves United States
Sadanand Singh United States
Lang Qin China
Kiwoong Kim South Korea
James Day relative to Kousuke Nakano Japan Kousuke Nakano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Kousuke Nakano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Day. The network helps show where James Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Day Line = papers co-authored together James Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007243
2 2015149
3 1994147
4 2006118
5 201291
6 200578
7 201071
8 200963
9 201563
10 201061
11 201357
12 200655
13 201647
14 200445
15 201144
16 201242
17 201040
18 201721
19 200521
20 201016

About James Day

James Day is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Geophysics and Education, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (11 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (10 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (7 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (6 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (6 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (6 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (5 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (484 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (770 citations), Geophysics (323 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (224 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (140 citations). James Day has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include John Beamish, D. A. Bonn, Tobias Herman, N. G. Holmes, Ido Roll, B. J. Ramshaw, W. N. Hardy, HC Fibiger, John A. Williams and F. Michael Saunders. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, Physical Review X and Instructional Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact