Mark C. Peterman
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
-
- Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
- 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
- Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 6
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 5
-
- Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies 1
- Co-authors
- Harvey A. Fishman (8 shared papers)Jaan Noolandi (4 shared papers)D. M. Bloom (3 shared papers)Mark S. Blumenkranz (2 shared papers)Philip Huie (3 shared papers)Mark S. Blumenkranz (3 shared papers)Hagan Bayley (1 shared paper)Stacey F. Bent (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Analytical Chemistry (2 papers)Biomedical Microdevices (2 papers)Artificial Organs (1 paper)Energy & Fuels (1 paper)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark C. Peterman
12 papers receiving 298 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 140
- Biomedical Engineering 184
- Bioengineering 21
- Biophysics 10
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 89
Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Peterman
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Peterman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Peterman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Peterman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Peterman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Peterman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Peterman. The network helps show where Mark C. Peterman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Mark C. Peterman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 70 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 2 |
About Mark C. Peterman
Mark C. Peterman is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (6 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (2 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (1 paper), Oil, Gas, and Environmental Issues (1 paper) and Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (140 citations), Biomedical Engineering (184 citations), Bioengineering (21 citations), Biophysics (10 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (89 citations). Mark C. Peterman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Harvey A. Fishman, Jaan Noolandi, D. M. Bloom, Mark S. Blumenkranz, Philip Huie, Mark S. Blumenkranz, Hagan Bayley, Stacey F. Bent, Jonathan M. Ziebarth and Orit Braha. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Biomedical Microdevices, Artificial Organs, Energy & Fuels and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.