Biomedical Microdevices

64.3k citations
2.0k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
    • Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
    • Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
    • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
    • Biosensors and Analytical Detection
    • Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

Papers in

    • Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications 596
    • Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies 588
    • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research 482
    • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation 307
    • Biosensors and Analytical Detection 172

Biomedical Microdevices

1.9k papers receiving 62.5k citations

Peers

Biomedical Microdevices
Comparison fields: 5 of 206
  • Biomedical Engineering 43.5k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 4.0k
  • Biomaterials 5.2k
  • Bioengineering 2.1k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 5.8k
Replace Nature Biomedical Engineering with:
Nature Biomedical Engineering United States
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology United States
ACS Central Science United States
Nano Today China
Biomicrofluidics United States
European Biophysics Journal Germany
Applied Materials Today China
Nanomedicine United States
Biotechnology Journal United States
Materials Today China
Biomedical Microdevices relative to Nature Biomedical Engineering United States Nature Biomedical Engineering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×200×400×600×800×908×
Nature Biomedical Engineering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Biomedical Microdevices

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biomedical Microdevices. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biomedical Microdevices with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomedical Microdevices more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Biomedical Microdevices

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biomedical Microdevices. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biomedical Microdevices.

About Biomedical Microdevices

The 2.0k papers published in Biomedical Microdevices in the last decades have received a total of 64.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Biomedical Microdevices usually cover Biomedical Engineering (1.4k papers), Bioengineering (90 papers), Pharmaceutical Science (90 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (244 papers) and Biomaterials (120 papers) specifically the topics of Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (596 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (588 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (482 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (307 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (216 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (172 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (108 papers) and Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (107 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biomedical Microdevices are Shuvo Roy, Aaron J. Fleischman, Álvaro Mata, Sangeeta N. Bhatia, Rashid Bashir, Jong Hwan Sung, Karen C. Cheung, Sylvain M. Martel, Gwo‐Bin Lee and Arianna Menciassi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact