Marie Smith

49 papers receiving 904 citations

Peers

Marie Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 515
  • Family Practice 138
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 36
  • Medical Terminology 4
  • General Health Professions 232
Replace June Tordoff with:
June Tordoff New Zealand
Anne Burns United States
Todd D. Sorensen United States
Teresa M. Salgado United States
Terry Porteous United Kingdom
Scott Cunningham United Kingdom
Elizabeth Hall‐Lipsy United States
Randal P. McDonough United States
Melissa Somma McGivney United States
Stephen W. Schondelmeyer United States
Marie Smith relative to June Tordoff New Zealand June Tordoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
June Tordoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marie Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marie Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marie Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marie Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marie Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marie Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marie Smith. The network helps show where Marie Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marie Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marie Smith Line = papers co-authored together Marie Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010186
2 2011108
3 201396
4 200964
5 201663
6 201937
7 201336
8 199133
9 201426
10 201626
11 201722
12 201921
13 200720
14 201819
15 201218
16 200916
17 201315
18 201714
19 199113
20 201712

About Marie Smith

Marie Smith is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Family Practice, having authored 53 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (22 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (515 citations), Family Practice (138 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (36 citations), Medical Terminology (4 citations) and General Health Professions (232 citations). Marie Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David W. Bates, Thomas Bodenheimer, Paul D. Cleary, Susan Spiggle, Daniel E. Buffington, Linnea A. Polgreen, Barry L. Carter, Paul A. James, Brian J. Isetts and Mark Dignan. Their work appears in journals such as Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Annals of Pharmacotherapy, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact