Daniel E. Buffington

15 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Buffington
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 156
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 85
  • Family Practice 23
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Pharmacology 64
Replace Veronica Sendersky with:
Veronica Sendersky United States
Francesco Landi Italy
David S. Craig United States
Aleksandra Kotlińska–Lemieszek Poland
Alex Secora United States
Christopher W. Goodman United States
Kyle P. Edmonds United States
Michelle Rossi United States
Juan M. Hincapie‐Castillo United States
Tracey L. Mersfelder United States
Daniel E. Buffington relative to Veronica Sendersky United States Veronica Sendersky's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Veronica Sendersky · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Buffington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Buffington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Buffington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Buffington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Buffington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Buffington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Buffington. The network helps show where Daniel E. Buffington may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Buffington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Buffington Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Buffington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2006215
2 201663
3 201948
4 199341
5 199329
6 200720
7 199919
8 20079
9
Understanding factors that contribute to the disposal of unused opioid medication
20198
10 20078
11 20006
12 20195
13 20174
14 20074
15 20064

About Daniel E. Buffington

Daniel E. Buffington is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Emergency Medical Services, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Physiology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (7 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (1 paper) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (156 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (85 citations), Family Practice (23 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation) and Pharmacology (64 citations). Daniel E. Buffington has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Brian J. Isetts, Michael S. Leong, Richard Rauck, Lynn R. Webster, Steven G. Charapata, Ronald Kartzinel, David Ellis, Mark S. Wallace, Thomas Alfieri and T. Christopher Bond. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Annals of Pharmacotherapy, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and Journal of the American Pharmacists Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact