Margot Hover
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Papers in
- Health 5
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 5
-
- Theological Perspectives and Practices 3
- Religion, Society, and Development 3
- Religion and Society Interactions 1
- Co-authors
- Emilia Bagiella (1 shared paper)Cristina Casalone (1 shared paper)Tobias Hirsch (1 shared paper)Richard P. Sloan (1 shared paper)Y. Hasan (1 shared paper)Larry VandeCreek (1 shared paper)Lucille B. Bearon (1 shared paper)Harold G. Koenig (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy (1 paper)Psycho-Oncology (1 paper)New England Journal of Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling Advancing theory and professional practice through scholarly and reflective publications (1 paper)Journal of Pastoral Care (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Margot Hover
6 papers receiving 250 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Health 248
- Clinical Psychology 119
- Religious studies 18
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 94
- Sociology and Political Science 133
Countries citing papers authored by Margot Hover
This map shows the geographic impact of Margot Hover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margot Hover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margot Hover more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margot Hover
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margot Hover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margot Hover. The network helps show where Margot Hover may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Margot Hover, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 207 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 65 | |
| 3 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 6 | If a patient asks you to pray with him. | 1986 | 1 |
| 7 | 1999 | 0 |
About Margot Hover
Margot Hover is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies, Public Administration and Plant Science, having authored 7 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers), Theological Perspectives and Practices (3 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (1 paper), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (1 paper), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (1 paper), Agriculture and Farm Safety (1 paper) and Social Work Education and Practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (248 citations), Clinical Psychology (119 citations), Religious studies (18 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (94 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (133 citations). Margot Hover has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Emilia Bagiella, Cristina Casalone, Tobias Hirsch, Richard P. Sloan, Y. Hasan, Larry VandeCreek, Lucille B. Bearon, Harold G. Koenig, Harold Koenig and George Handzo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, Psycho-Oncology, New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling Advancing theory and professional practice through scholarly and reflective publications and Journal of Pastoral Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.