Simon Peng‐Keller

43 papers receiving 223 citations

Peers

Simon Peng‐Keller
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Health 154
  • Clinical Psychology 101
  • Religious studies 22
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 103
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 15
Replace Margot Hover with:
Margot Hover United States
Bernard Janse van Rensburg South Africa
Curtis R. Brant United States
Peter J. Verhagen Netherlands
Sasan Vasegh Iran
Frederic C. Craigie United States
Sharon E. Cheston United States
Dorte Toudal Viftrup Denmark
V. Goli India
Marie-José Gijsberts Netherlands
Simon Peng‐Keller relative to Margot Hover United States Margot Hover's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28×
Margot Hover · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Peng‐Keller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Peng‐Keller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Peng‐Keller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Peng‐Keller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Peng‐Keller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Peng‐Keller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Peng‐Keller. The network helps show where Simon Peng‐Keller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Peng‐Keller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Peng‐Keller Line = papers co-authored together Simon Peng‐Keller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202121
2 201919
3 201919
4 202017
5 201416
6 202113
7 202011
8 201711
9 202111
10 202210
11 202110
12 20219
13 20218
14 20207
15 20217
16 20187
17 20205
18 20175
19 20244
20 20174

About Simon Peng‐Keller

Simon Peng‐Keller is a scholar working on Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Religious studies, having authored 64 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (36 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (19 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (11 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (10 papers), Religion, Theology, and Education (9 papers), Media, Religion, Digital Communication (6 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (5 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (154 citations), Clinical Psychology (101 citations), Religious studies (22 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (103 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (15 citations). Simon Peng‐Keller has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Rufer, Rahel Naef, Hanspeter Moergeli, Heidi Petry, Ingolf U. Dalferth, Josef Jenewein, David Blum, Anja Lorch, Harvey Max Chochinov and Haiko Sprott. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Health and Social Care Chaplaincy, BMC Health Services Research, Journal of Religion and Health and BMJ Global Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact