Marcus Leaning

522 citations
15 papers · 268 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Marcus Leaning

13 papers receiving 236 citations

Peers

Marcus Leaning
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Computer Science Applications 39
  • Library and Information Sciences 10
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 79
  • Information Systems 116
  • Communication 25
Replace Zaini Amir with:
Zaini Amir Malaysia
Ann-Britt Enochsson Sweden
David Georgina United States
Deryn M. Watson United Kingdom
Glenn Russell Australia
George M. Piskurich United States
Stephen W. Harmon United States
Martyn Wild Australia
Álvaro Salinas Chile
Kees Pannekeet Netherlands
Marcus Leaning relative to Zaini Amir Malaysia Zaini Amir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Zaini Amir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marcus Leaning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marcus Leaning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marcus Leaning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marcus Leaning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marcus Leaning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marcus Leaning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marcus Leaning. The network helps show where Marcus Leaning may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Marcus Leaning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marcus Leaning Line = papers co-authored together Marcus Leaning links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2019108
2 201593
3
Visions of Community: Community Informatics and the Contested Nature of a Polysemic Term for a Progressive Discipline
201118
4 200516
5 20149
6
The Internet, Power and Society: Rethinking the Power of the Internet to Change Lives
20097
7 20095
8
Theories and models of Media Literacy
20094
9 20122
10 20022
11 20071
12 20141
13
Issues in Information and Media Literacy: Volume 1: Criticism, History and Policy
20091
14 20071
15
Collaborative Learning in Media Education
20150

About Marcus Leaning

Marcus Leaning is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Political Science and International Relations and Information Systems, having authored 15 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literacy, Media, and Education (4 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (2 papers), Digital literacy in education (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (1 paper), Open Source Software Innovations (1 paper) and Digital Games and Media (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (39 citations), Library and Information Sciences (10 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (79 citations), Information Systems (116 citations) and Communication (25 citations). Marcus Leaning has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Paul Manning. Their work appears in journals such as Media and Communication, Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, British Journal of Educational Studies, Journal of Media Practice and Information Technologies and International Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact