Marco Giancola

41 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Marco Giancola
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 151
  • Applied Psychology 29
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 59
  • Social Psychology 91
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 6
Replace Ladislas Nalborczyk with:
Ladislas Nalborczyk France
Michelle Verges United States
Xianyou He China
Ekaterina R. Stepanova Canada
Jonathan R. Zadra United States
Kyle T. Gagnon United States
Alistair W. Kerr United Kingdom
Erica L. Wohldmann United States
Ida Sergi Italy
Thorsten M. Erle Germany
Marco Giancola relative to Ladislas Nalborczyk France Ladislas Nalborczyk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Ladislas Nalborczyk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marco Giancola

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marco Giancola's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marco Giancola with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marco Giancola more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marco Giancola

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marco Giancola. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marco Giancola. The network helps show where Marco Giancola may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Marco Giancola, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marco Giancola Line = papers co-authored together Marco Giancola links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201933
2 202223
3 202318
4 202118
5 202217
6 202217
7 202317
8 202116
9 202315
10 201815
11 202215
12 202115
13 202215
14 202215
15 202413
16 202212
17 202311
18 20238
19 20248
20 20238

About Marco Giancola

Marco Giancola is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 45 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (13 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (6 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Design Education and Practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (151 citations), Applied Psychology (29 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (59 citations), Social Psychology (91 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (6 citations). Marco Giancola has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Czechia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Simonetta D’Amico, Massimiliano Palmiero, Laura Piccardi, Raffaella Nori, Maria Chiara Pino, Marta Olivetti Belardinelli, Paola Verde, Anna Maria Giannini, G. Vinciguerra and Verónica Robles‐García. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Thinking Skills and Creativity, European Journal of Developmental Psychology, Sustainability and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact