Malcolm Pyles Chelliah

25 papers receiving 864 citations

Peers

Malcolm Pyles Chelliah
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Urology 138
  • Rehabilitation 71
  • Health Informatics 15
  • Pharmacology 81
  • Genetics 42
Replace Muhammad Farooq Rai with:
Muhammad Farooq Rai United States
Stephany Cares Huber Brazil
Jens Schaumburger Germany
Jiajie Li China
Constanza Martínez Chile
Mengting Chen China
Mark B. Sherwood United States
Chen Dong China
Fiorella Descalzi Italy
Małgorzata Litwiniuk Poland
Malcolm Pyles Chelliah relative to Muhammad Farooq Rai United States Muhammad Farooq Rai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.1×
Muhammad Farooq Rai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Pyles Chelliah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Pyles Chelliah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Pyles Chelliah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Pyles Chelliah more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Pyles Chelliah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Pyles Chelliah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Pyles Chelliah. The network helps show where Malcolm Pyles Chelliah may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Pyles Chelliah, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm Pyles Chelliah Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm Pyles Chelliah links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019245
2 2020123
3 201698
4 201897
5 201576
6 201750
7 201631
8 201830
9 202425
10 201823
11 201822
12 201515
13 201913
14 20168
15 20188
16 20207
17 20196
18 20225
19 20183
20 20193

About Malcolm Pyles Chelliah

Malcolm Pyles Chelliah is a scholar working on Dermatology, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Rehabilitation and Urology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 897 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (4 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas (2 papers), Hair Growth and Disorders (2 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (2 papers) and Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (138 citations), Rehabilitation (71 citations), Health Informatics (15 citations), Pharmacology (81 citations) and Genetics (42 citations). Malcolm Pyles Chelliah has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Khosrow Siamak Houschyar, Zeshaan N. Maan, Frank Siemers, Joyce M. C. Teng, Zachary A. Zinn, Dominik Duscher, Arash J. Momeni, Susanne Rein, Alexander J. Whittam and Ludwik Krzysztof Branski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Handchirurgie · Mikrochirurgie · Plastische Chirurgie, Journal of Wound Care, EClinicalMedicine and Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact