Mike Schaekermann
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mike Schaekermann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mike Schaekermann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mike Schaekermann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mike Schaekermann. Mike Schaekermann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mike Schaekermann
11 papers receiving 250 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Mike Schaekermann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mike Schaekermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mike Schaekermann. The network helps show where Mike Schaekermann may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Mike Schaekermann
This map shows the geographic impact of Mike Schaekermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mike Schaekermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mike Schaekermann more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.