Malcolm J. Bond

100 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Malcolm J. Bond
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Applied Psychology 141
  • Family Practice 48
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 34
  • Clinical Psychology 470
  • General Health Professions 410
Replace Janet R. Cummings with:
Janet R. Cummings United States
Beate Wild Germany
Joni Vander Bilt United States
Molly E. Waring United States
John S. Wiebe United States
David S. Brody United States
Kristin S. Vickers United States
Lawrence J. Cohen United States
Adriaan Visser Netherlands
J. B. McKinlay United States
Malcolm J. Bond relative to Janet R. Cummings United States Janet R. Cummings's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Janet R. Cummings · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm J. Bond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm J. Bond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm J. Bond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm J. Bond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm J. Bond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm J. Bond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm J. Bond. The network helps show where Malcolm J. Bond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm J. Bond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm J. Bond Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm J. Bond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988239
2 2001190
3 2002152
4 1983146
5 1998123
6 200695
7 201087
8 199581
9 199772
10 199163
11 200358
12 200857
13 200450
14 201648
15 199647
16 201241
17 200641
18 199141
19 200639
20 199237

About Malcolm J. Bond

Malcolm J. Bond is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology, having authored 102 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (9 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (5 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (141 citations), Family Practice (48 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (34 citations), Clinical Psychology (470 citations) and General Health Professions (410 citations). Malcolm J. Bond has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include N. T. Feather, Michael Clark, Ruth Sladek, N Broadhurst, Kathryn Williams, Paddy A. Phillips, Lynsey Brown, Suzanne Davies, Robert D. Harris and D. S. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology Health & Medicine, The Medical Journal of Australia, Australasian Journal on Ageing, Disability and Rehabilitation and Personality and Individual Differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact