Beate Wild

4.9k citations
149 papers · 3.3k · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Beate Wild

138 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Beate Wild
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
  • General Decision Sciences 104
  • Pharmacy 111
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 332
  • Applied Psychology 103
Replace Malcolm J. Bond with:
Malcolm J. Bond Australia
Malcolm Battersby Australia
Molly E. Waring United States
David S. Brody United States
Duncan Stewart United Kingdom
Terrence L. Rose United States
Daniel Marson United States
Joni Vander Bilt United States
Melony E. Sorbero United States
Michael Schoenbaum United States
Beate Wild relative to Malcolm J. Bond Australia Malcolm J. Bond's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Malcolm J. Bond · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beate Wild

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beate Wild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beate Wild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beate Wild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beate Wild

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beate Wild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beate Wild. The network helps show where Beate Wild may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beate Wild, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beate Wild Line = papers co-authored together Beate Wild links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 149 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013285
2 2013213
3 2010200
4 2012139
5 2000118
6 201091
7 201683
8 200083
9 201381
10 201475
11 201374
12 200958
13 201257
14 201556
15 200352
16 201150
17 201450
18 201650
19 201248
20 200948

About Beate Wild

Beate Wild is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and General Health Professions, having authored 149 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (38 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (10 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (10 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (9 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (8 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (5 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), General Decision Sciences (104 citations), Pharmacy (111 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (332 citations) and Applied Psychology (103 citations). Beate Wild has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Herzog, Bernd Löwe, Stephan Zipfel, Hermann Brenner, Hans‐Christoph Friederich, Dieter Schellberg, Mechthild Hartmann, Imad Maatouk, Tilmann Betsch and Klaus Fiedler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Psychosomatic Research, PLoS ONE, Journal of Affective Disorders, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact