M. Stacey
Impact in
- Pharmaceutical Science top 1%
- Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
- Organic Chemistry top 1%
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
Papers in
-
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 70
-
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 28
- Biopolymer Synthesis and Applications 21
- Co-authors
- S. A. Barker (69 shared papers)E. J. Bourne (36 shared papers)A. B. Foster (39 shared papers)J. C. Tatlow (32 shared papers)J. S. Brimacombe (23 shared papers)D. H. Whiffen (4 shared papers)A. S. JONES (9 shared papers)J. M. Webber (10 shared papers)
- Journals
- Nature (33 papers)Carbohydrate Research (18 papers)Tetrahedron (11 papers)Clinica Chimica Acta (8 papers)Fuel (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
M. Stacey
213 papers receiving 3.5k citations
M. Stacey's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
- Pharmaceutical Science 404
- Organic Chemistry 1.4k
- Biotechnology 346
- Nutrition and Dietetics 468
- Molecular Biology 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by M. Stacey
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Stacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Stacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Stacey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Stacey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Stacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Stacey. The network helps show where M. Stacey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Stacey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 218 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Infra-red spectra of carbohydrates. Part I. Some derivatives of D-glucopyranose Hit paper breakdown → | 1954 | 327 |
| 2 | 1973 | 138 | |
| 3 | 1966 | 128 | |
| 4 | 1958 | 102 | |
| 5 | 1959 | 89 | |
| 6 | 1958 | 74 | |
| 7 | 1967 | 69 | |
| 8 | 1953 | 66 | |
| 9 | 1960 | 65 | |
| 10 | 1960 | 61 | |
| 11 | 1960 | 57 | |
| 12 | 1974 | 56 | |
| 13 | 1957 | 54 | |
| 14 | 1958 | 53 | |
| 15 | 1962 | 51 | |
| 16 | 1953 | 51 | |
| 17 | 1957 | 49 | |
| 18 | 1971 | 48 | |
| 19 | 1956 | 47 | |
| 20 | 1964 | 45 |
About M. Stacey
M. Stacey is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Pharmaceutical Science, Biotechnology and Spectroscopy, having authored 218 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (70 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (28 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (27 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (25 papers), Biopolymer Synthesis and Applications (21 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (16 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (16 papers) and Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (404 citations), Organic Chemistry (1.4k citations), Biotechnology (346 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (468 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.5k citations). M. Stacey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include S. A. Barker, E. J. Bourne, A. B. Foster, J. C. Tatlow, J. S. Brimacombe, D. H. Whiffen, A. S. JONES, J. M. Webber, W. G. Overend and M.J. How. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Carbohydrate Research, Tetrahedron, Clinica Chimica Acta and Fuel.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.