M. Namjoshi

901 citations
33 papers · 702 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

M. Namjoshi

31 papers receiving 655 citations

Peers

M. Namjoshi
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 494
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Oncology 82
  • Pharmacology 42
  • Speech and Hearing 15
Replace Barbara van Zwieten‐Boot with:
Barbara van Zwieten‐Boot Netherlands
Robin White United States
W. Paska United Kingdom
Carolin Miltenburger Sweden
Hans Bendz Sweden
Minoru Takeshima Japan
Chen Hu China
Carole Dembek United States
Pim B. van der Meer Netherlands
B. Cordier France
M. Namjoshi relative to Barbara van Zwieten‐Boot Netherlands Barbara van Zwieten‐Boot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Barbara van Zwieten‐Boot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Namjoshi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Namjoshi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Namjoshi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Namjoshi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Namjoshi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Namjoshi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Namjoshi. The network helps show where M. Namjoshi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Namjoshi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Namjoshi Line = papers co-authored together M. Namjoshi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003166
2 200178
3 200174
4 200254
5 201149
6 200447
7 200240
8 200325
9 201223
10 201219
11 200218
12 200417
13 201215
14 20028
15 20028
16 20047
17 20036
18 20115
19 20225
20 20005

About M. Namjoshi

M. Namjoshi is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Economics and Econometrics and Pharmacology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 702 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (13 papers), Bone health and treatments (7 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (6 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (3 papers), Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (494 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations), Oncology (82 citations), Pharmacology (42 citations) and Speech and Hearing (15 citations). M. Namjoshi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Mauricio Tohen, Don P. Buesching, Alan Breier, Richard C. Risser, Lizheng Shi, Robert W. Baker, Jipan Xie, T.M. Sanger, Eric Q. Wu and Starr L. Grundy. Their work appears in journals such as European Neuropsychopharmacology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal of Medical Economics and CNS Drugs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact