M. E. Chamberlin

37 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

M. E. Chamberlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 435
  • Aquatic Science 154
  • Insect Science 240
  • Ecology 348
  • Aging 15
Replace Hans Komnick with:
Hans Komnick Germany
Carolyn A. Rankin United States
Ilse Claeys Belgium
Lisa M. H. Helms United States
L.P.C. Schot Netherlands
Magdaléna Hodková Czechia
João C. R. Cardoso Portugal
Wolfgang Weidemann Germany
John A. Donald Australia
Thomas L. Pannabecker United States
M. E. Chamberlin relative to Hans Komnick Germany Hans Komnick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Hans Komnick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. E. Chamberlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. E. Chamberlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. E. Chamberlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. E. Chamberlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. E. Chamberlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. E. Chamberlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. E. Chamberlin. The network helps show where M. E. Chamberlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside M. E. Chamberlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. E. Chamberlin Line = papers co-authored together M. E. Chamberlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989312
2 199887
3 200451
4 198448
5 199148
6 200241
7 199737
8 199335
9 198833
10 199230
11 199027
12 200426
13 199025
14 198925
15 198325
16 198224
17 199223
18
Luminal alkalinization by the isolated midgut of the tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta).
199021
19 198620
20 198220

About M. E. Chamberlin

M. E. Chamberlin is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Insect Science and Aquatic Science, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (18 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (14 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (8 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (7 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers) and Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (435 citations), Aquatic Science (154 citations), Insect Science (240 citations), Ecology (348 citations) and Aging (15 citations). M. E. Chamberlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Strange, James S. Ballantyne, J. E. Phillips, Frank M. Horodyski, Kyeong‐Yeoll Lee, L. J. Mandel, Hélène Glémet, Thomas D. Singer, Ann LeFurgey and J. Meredith. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Biology, Journal of Experimental Zoology, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology and Journal of Insect Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact