M. E. Chamberlin

38 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

M. E. Chamberlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 537
  • Insect Science 314
  • Aquatic Science 183
  • Ecology 426
  • Nephrology 89
Replace E. Zebe with:
E. Zebe Germany
Carolyn A. Rankin United States
Ilse Claeys Belgium
Magdaléna Hodková Czechia
Thomas L. Pannabecker United States
H. Huddart United Kingdom
L.P.C. Schot Netherlands
Lisa M. H. Helms United States
João C. R. Cardoso Portugal
Betty J. Wall United States
M. E. Chamberlin relative to E. Zebe Germany E. Zebe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.1×
E. Zebe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. E. Chamberlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. E. Chamberlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. E. Chamberlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. E. Chamberlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. E. Chamberlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. E. Chamberlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. E. Chamberlin. The network helps show where M. E. Chamberlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside M. E. Chamberlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. E. Chamberlin Line = papers co-authored together M. E. Chamberlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989356
2 1987122
3 199896
4 198452
5 200451
6 199151
7 200247
8 199737
9 199337
10 198836
11 199235
12 197733
13 199032
14 198329
15 199028
16 198228
17 200427
18 199226
19 198926
20 198624

About M. E. Chamberlin

M. E. Chamberlin is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Insect Science and Genetics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (19 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (14 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (8 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (7 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (5 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (4 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers) and Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (537 citations), Insect Science (314 citations), Aquatic Science (183 citations), Ecology (426 citations) and Nephrology (89 citations). M. E. Chamberlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Kevin Strange, J. E. Phillips, James S. Ballantyne, Frank M. Horodyski, Kyeong‐Yeoll Lee, L. J. Mandel, John W. Hanrahan, Brian J. Thomson, Hélène Glémet and Thomas D. Singer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Biology, Journal of Experimental Zoology, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology and Journal of Insect Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact