M. Denham

430 citations
21 papers · 293 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

M. Denham

20 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

M. Denham
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Family Practice 11
  • Control and Systems Engineering 91
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 8
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 12
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 59
Replace Christian Brohet with:
Christian Brohet Belgium
Shangjie Chen China
Te-Son Kuo Taiwan
M. Darwish Egypt
Donna L. Hudson United States
Juan Pardo Spain
Andrew Levy United States
Joseph El Youssef United States
Anne Farret France
M. Denham relative to Christian Brohet Belgium Christian Brohet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Christian Brohet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Denham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Denham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Denham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Denham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Denham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Denham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Denham. The network helps show where M. Denham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside M. Denham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Denham Line = papers co-authored together M. Denham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197474
2 198741
3 198835
4 200134
5 198733
6 197324
7 197512
8 19788
9 19826
10 19735
11 20084
12 19743
13 19753
14 20013
15 20032
16
Focus on the elderly: ethics of research.
19841
17 19911
18
The elderly today and tomorrow: medication and the elderly.
19881
19 19921
20 20121

About M. Denham

M. Denham is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Control and Systems Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Fractal and DNA sequence analysis (3 papers), Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (2 papers), Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems (2 papers), Control Systems and Identification (2 papers), Flow Measurement and Analysis (2 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (2 papers) and Restless Legs Syndrome Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (11 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (91 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (8 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (12 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (59 citations). M. Denham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include P. W. Nicholson, SM Dobbs, J. P. Royston, RJ Dobbs, О. S. Vinogradova, Yakov Kazanovich, Frank C. Hoppensteadt, Roman Borisyuk, R. Cheung and John R. E. Dickins. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Network Computation in Neural Systems, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Journal of Clinical Pathology and Biosystems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact