M. Denham

21 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

M. Denham
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Family Practice 10
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 8
  • Control and Systems Engineering 104
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 65
  • Neurology 44
Replace Te-Son Kuo with:
Te-Son Kuo Taiwan
M. Darwish Egypt
Robert E. Morley United States
Shangjie Chen China
Tom De Smet Belgium
H.-C. Tien United States
D.L. Hudson United States
Andrew Levy United States
James Pardey United Kingdom
M. Denham relative to Te-Son Kuo Taiwan Te-Son Kuo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Te-Son Kuo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Denham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Denham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Denham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Denham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Denham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Denham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Denham. The network helps show where M. Denham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside M. Denham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Denham Line = papers co-authored together M. Denham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197488
2 198752
3 198736
4 198835
5 200135
6 197324
7 197511
8 19788
9 19827
10 19736
11 20084
12 20014
13 19743
14 19753
15 20022
16 20032
17 19911
18
The elderly today and tomorrow: medication and the elderly.
19881
19 20011
20
Focus on the elderly: ethics of research.
19841

About M. Denham

M. Denham is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Control and Systems Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 22 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Fractal and DNA sequence analysis (3 papers), Control Systems and Identification (2 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (2 papers), Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (2 papers), Flow Measurement and Analysis (2 papers), Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems (2 papers) and Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (10 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (8 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (104 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (65 citations) and Neurology (44 citations). M. Denham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include SM Dobbs, P. W. Nicholson, RJ Dobbs, J. P. Royston, Frank C. Hoppensteadt, Yakov Kazanovich, Roman Borisyuk, О. S. Vinogradova, David Seal and John R. E. Dickins. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Network Computation in Neural Systems, Transfusion and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact