M. Claybourn

720 citations
18 papers · 538 · h-index 13

Impact in

  • Biophysics top 5%
    • Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Archeology top 2%
    • Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis

Papers in

M. Claybourn

18 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

M. Claybourn
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Biophysics 78
  • Archeology 102
  • Analytical Chemistry 88
  • Conservation 28
  • Materials Chemistry 173
Replace Stephen J. Spells with:
Stephen J. Spells United Kingdom
Pacifico Cofrancesco Italy
J. Akhavan United Kingdom
Cynthia Hanson United States
H. S. Sands United Kingdom
Yukio MINAMI Japan
B. Wall Germany
F. L. S. Cuppo Brazil
Qassem I. Mohaidat Jordan
Dianyang Lin China
M. Claybourn relative to Stephen J. Spells United Kingdom Stephen J. Spells's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stephen J. Spells · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Claybourn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Claybourn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Claybourn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Claybourn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Claybourn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Claybourn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Claybourn. The network helps show where M. Claybourn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Claybourn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Claybourn Line = papers co-authored together M. Claybourn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 199994
2 200083
3 199065
4 199157
5 198848
6 198738
7 198824
8 200618
9 198517
10 198616
11 198616
12 198816
13 198912
14 198211
15 19949
16 19928
17 19874
18 19942

About M. Claybourn

M. Claybourn is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Analytical Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 18 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor materials and interfaces (6 papers), Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (6 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (5 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (3 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (2 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (2 papers) and Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (78 citations), Archeology (102 citations), Analytical Chemistry (88 citations), Conservation (28 citations) and Materials Chemistry (173 citations). M. Claybourn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include M. F. Ansell, Gary Ellis, R. C. Newman, R.C. Newman, M. Reading, P. H. Turner, H. M. Pollock, A. Hammiche, J. Woods and A.W. Brinkman. Their work appears in journals such as Semiconductor Science and Technology, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy, Journal of Crystal Growth and Journal of Applied Polymer Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact