Luke Webb
Impact in
-
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
-
- Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Papers in
-
- Technology Assessment and Management 2
-
- Defense, Military, and Policy Studies 1
- COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts 1
- Co-authors
- Cees Bil (2 shared papers)Thomas House (1 shared paper)Lorenzo Pellis (2 shared papers)Ian Hall (2 shared papers)Nick Gent (1 shared paper)Julia Verne (1 shared paper)Jo Hardstaff (1 shared paper)Christopher E. Overton (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLoS Computational Biology (1 paper)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (1 paper)48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition (1 paper)RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Luke Webb
3 papers receiving 13 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
- Modeling and Simulation 10
- Infectious Diseases 6
- Emergency Medical Services 2
- Virology 1
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 1
Countries citing papers authored by Luke Webb
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Webb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Webb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Webb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Webb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Webb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Webb. The network helps show where Luke Webb may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Luke Webb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 0 |
About Luke Webb
Luke Webb is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Economics and Econometrics, Health, General Health Professions and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 4 papers that have together received 13 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Assessment and Management (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (1 paper), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper), Global Health Care Issues (1 paper), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (1 paper), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (1 paper), Disaster Management and Resilience (1 paper) and COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (10 citations), Infectious Diseases (6 citations), Emergency Medical Services (2 citations), Virology (1 citation) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (1 citation). Luke Webb has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Cees Bil, Thomas House, Lorenzo Pellis, Ian Hall, Nick Gent, Julia Verne, Jo Hardstaff, Christopher E. Overton and Karthik Paranthaman. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS Computational Biology, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition and RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.