Luke E. Mahon
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Color perception and design
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 8
- Neural dynamics and brain function 3
-
- Color Science and Applications 5
- Co-authors
- Russell L. De Valois (5 shared papers)Nicolas P. Cottaris (2 shared papers)Joshua Wilson (2 shared papers)S.D. Elfar (2 shared papers)Karen K. De Valois (2 shared papers)Eugene Switkes (1 shared paper)Algis J. Vingrys (4 shared papers)Robert J. Jacobs (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Vision Research (4 papers)Clinical and Experimental Optometry (2 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Visual Neuroscience (1 paper)Optometry and Vision Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Luke E. Mahon
11 papers receiving 492 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Cognitive Neuroscience 444
- Social Psychology 144
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 167
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 90
- Sensory Systems 20
Countries citing papers authored by Luke E. Mahon
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke E. Mahon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke E. Mahon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke E. Mahon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luke E. Mahon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke E. Mahon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke E. Mahon. The network helps show where Luke E. Mahon may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Luke E. Mahon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 151 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 138 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 99 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 33 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 1 |
About Luke E. Mahon
Luke E. Mahon is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Social Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Color Science and Applications (5 papers), Color perception and design (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (1 paper), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (1 paper) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (444 citations), Social Psychology (144 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (167 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (90 citations) and Sensory Systems (20 citations). Luke E. Mahon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Russell L. De Valois, Nicolas P. Cottaris, Joshua Wilson, S.D. Elfar, Karen K. De Valois, Eugene Switkes, Algis J. Vingrys, Robert J. Jacobs, Yang Tao and Suzanne M. J. Fleiszig. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Visual Neuroscience and Optometry and Vision Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.