Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch

47 papers receiving 990 citations

Peers

Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 320
  • Organic Chemistry 381
  • Pharmaceutical Science 72
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 79
  • Drug Discovery 1
Replace Rafał Kurczab with:
Rafał Kurczab Poland
Emil Pop United States
Zdzisław Chilmończyk Poland
Fabián López-Vallejo United States
Bernard Testa Switzerland
Antonio Carrieri Italy
Salvatore Guccione Italy
Vikramdeep Monga India
Alka Kurup United States
Werner Kiefer Germany
Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch relative to Rafał Kurczab Poland Rafał Kurczab's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Rafał Kurczab · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch. The network helps show where Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch Line = papers co-authored together Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200888
2 201882
3 200374
4 200749
5 201548
6 200745
7 200442
8 201042
9 199941
10 200041
11 201239
12 200733
13 200728
14 201225
15 200624
16 200923
17 201221
18 200919
19 201719
20 201118

About Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch

Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Organic Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Spectroscopy, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (18 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Phenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and Activities (8 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (7 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (6 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (6 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers) and Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (320 citations), Organic Chemistry (381 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (72 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (79 citations) and Drug Discovery (1 citation). Luis E. Bruno‐Blanch has collaborated with scholars based in Argentina, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Alan Talevi, Eduardo A. Castro, Pablo R. Duchowicz, Luciana Gavernet, Guillermina Estiú, Carolina L. Bellera, Jorge Gálvez, Ramón García‐Domenech, María Esperanza Ruiz and Germán A. Islan. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact