John G. Conran

169 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

John G. Conran
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.2k
  • Paleontology 278
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 324
  • Molecular Biology 1.7k
  • Plant Science 896
Replace Sarah Mathews with:
Sarah Mathews United States
Ze‐Long Nie China
Jürg Schönenberger Austria
Catarina Rydin Sweden
Steven J. Wagstaff New Zealand
Hervé Sauquet Australia
Madeline M. Harley United Kingdom
Ulf Swenson Sweden
Douglas C. Daly United States
Niklas Wikström Sweden
John G. Conran relative to Sarah Mathews United States Sarah Mathews's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Sarah Mathews · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John G. Conran

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John G. Conran's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John G. Conran with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John G. Conran more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John G. Conran

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John G. Conran. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John G. Conran. The network helps show where John G. Conran may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John G. Conran, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John G. Conran Line = papers co-authored together John G. Conran links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 177 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015159
2 200798
3 201297
4 200993
5 201584
6
Consider the lilies: systematics of liliales
200081
7 201479
8 201573
9 200467
10 201267
11 201267
12 200063
13 201453
14 201752
15 199650
16
Phylogenetic studies of Asparagales based on four plastid DNA regions
200049
17 200048
18 202147
19 201343
20 201042

About John G. Conran

John G. Conran is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Genetics, having authored 177 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (114 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (82 papers), Plant and animal studies (50 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (23 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (22 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (21 papers), Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (19 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.2k citations), Paleontology (278 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (324 citations), Molecular Biology (1.7k citations) and Plant Science (896 citations). John G. Conran has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and China. Frequent co-authors include Daphne E. Lee, Jennifer M. Bannister, Jie Li, Paula J. Rudall, Dallas C. Mildenhall, Mark W. Chase, Hsi‐Wen Li, Jerrold I. Davis, Dennis Wm. Stevenson and David C. Christophel. Their work appears in journals such as Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, Australian Systematic Botany, Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, Plant Systematics and Evolution and Alcheringa An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact