Lorene Armstrong

24 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Lorene Armstrong's Hit Papers

Chemistry and Biological Activities of Processed Camellia sinensis Teas: A Comprehensive Review 2019 · 402 citations
4020+2+4Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Lorene Armstrong
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Biochemistry 229
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 349
  • Food Science 268
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 25
  • Biological Psychiatry 29
Replace Ji-Qiang Jin with:
Ji-Qiang Jin China
Jung Nam Choi South Korea
Jianming Zeng China
Xiaomin Yu China
Yuanshan Yu China
Munawar Abbas Pakistan
Lisete Paiva Portugal
Marcel Pârvu Romania
Salwa Abid‐Essefi Tunisia
Lorene Armstrong relative to Ji-Qiang Jin China Ji-Qiang Jin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ji-Qiang Jin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lorene Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lorene Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lorene Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lorene Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lorene Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lorene Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lorene Armstrong. The network helps show where Lorene Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lorene Armstrong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lorene Armstrong Line = papers co-authored together Lorene Armstrong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Chemistry and Biological Activities of Processed Camellia sinensis Teas: A Comprehensive Review
Hit paper breakdown →
2019402
2 2019186
3 201769
4 202351
5 202043
6 201939
7 201933
8 201932
9 199830
10 201222
11 201819
12 201717
13 201417
14 202116
15 201916
16 19918
17 20138
18 20205
19 20233
20 20243

About Lorene Armstrong

Lorene Armstrong is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Food Science, Pharmacology and Biotechnology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (7 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (5 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (4 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (3 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (2 papers), Algal biology and biofuel production (2 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (2 papers) and Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (229 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (349 citations), Food Science (268 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (25 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (29 citations). Lorene Armstrong has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Liang Zhang, Chi‐Tang Ho, Jie Zhou, Daniel Granato, Jânio Sousa Santos, Javad Sharifi‐Rad, Hosana Maria Debonsi, Farukh Sharopov, Charles Oluwaseun Adetunji and Soheb Anwar Mohammed. Their work appears in journals such as Microscopy Research and Technique, Journal of Natural Products, Journal of Mammalogy, Current Microbiology and Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact