L.M. Poste

1.1k citations
40 papers · 920 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

    • Meat and Animal Product Quality 26
    • Animal Nutrition and Physiology 20
    • Livestock and Poultry Management 2
    • Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 8

L.M. Poste

36 papers receiving 766 citations

Peers

L.M. Poste
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Animal Science and Zoology 490
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 258
  • Food Science 309
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 95
  • Biochemistry 36
Replace Tuomo Tupasela with:
Tuomo Tupasela Finland
D.K. Larick United States
Jacques H. Houben Netherlands
R. Smithard United Kingdom
Nelson O Huerta-Leidenz United States
Virginia Celia Resconi Spain
S. Thomke Sweden
RUEL L. WILSON United States
Elizabeth Larmond Canada
Norma A. Pensel Argentina
L.M. Poste relative to Tuomo Tupasela Finland Tuomo Tupasela's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tuomo Tupasela · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L.M. Poste

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L.M. Poste's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.M. Poste with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.M. Poste more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L.M. Poste

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.M. Poste. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.M. Poste. The network helps show where L.M. Poste may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L.M. Poste, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L.M. Poste Line = papers co-authored together L.M. Poste links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991153
2 200195
3 199085
4 198659
5 199253
6 199049
7 199744
8 198839
9 198531
10 199328
11 199327
12 199627
13 199427
14 198724
15 199021
16 198420
17 198817
18 198615
19 198915
20 199611

About L.M. Poste

L.M. Poste is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, Aquatic Science and Small Animals, having authored 40 papers that have together received 920 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (26 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (20 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (8 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (5 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (3 papers), Food composition and properties (3 papers) and Livestock and Poultry Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (490 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (258 citations), Food Science (309 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (95 citations) and Biochemistry (36 citations). L.M. Poste has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and Tanzania. Frequent co-authors include Gail Butler, Francis Minvielle, Elizabeth Larmond, CLAUDE WILLEMOT, Cuiying Ma, M. R. Sahasrabudhe, Venktesh R. Harwalkar, Joane Martel, Vernon D. Burrows and Serge A. Pommier. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Animal Science, Poultry Science, Food Quality and Preference and Meat Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact