Liya Yi
Impact in
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Insect Utilization and Effects
- Bee Products Chemical Analysis
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Animal and Plant Science Education
Papers in
-
- Insect Utilization and Effects 6
- Bee Products Chemical Analysis 1
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 4
- Co-authors
- C.M.M. Lakemond (5 shared papers)M.A.J.S. van Boekel (4 shared papers)Leonard M.C. Sagis (1 shared paper)A. van Huis (1 shared paper)H.J.F. van Valenberg (2 shared papers)Sjef Boeren (1 shared paper)Jeffery K. Tomberlin (1 shared paper)Daylan A. Tzompa‐Sosa (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Insects as Food and Feed (2 papers)Food Research International (1 paper)European Food Research and Technology (1 paper)Food Chemistry (1 paper)Elsevier eBooks (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Liya Yi
6 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Liya Yi's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Insect Science 1.1k
- Social Psychology 538
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 213
- Genetics 300
- Aquatic Science 57
Countries citing papers authored by Liya Yi
This map shows the geographic impact of Liya Yi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liya Yi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liya Yi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Liya Yi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liya Yi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liya Yi. The network helps show where Liya Yi may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Liya Yi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Extraction and characterisation of protein fractions from five insect species Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 522 |
| 2 | 2014 | 272 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 164 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 89 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 65 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 60 |
About Liya Yi
Liya Yi is a scholar working on Insect Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Plant Science and Social Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Utilization and Effects (6 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (2 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (1 paper), Meat and Animal Product Quality (1 paper) and Animal and Plant Science Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.1k citations), Social Psychology (538 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (213 citations), Genetics (300 citations) and Aquatic Science (57 citations). Liya Yi has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include C.M.M. Lakemond, M.A.J.S. van Boekel, Leonard M.C. Sagis, A. van Huis, H.J.F. van Valenberg, Sjef Boeren, Jeffery K. Tomberlin, Daylan A. Tzompa‐Sosa, Juan A. Morales-Ramos and M. Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, Food Research International, European Food Research and Technology, Food Chemistry and Elsevier eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.