Lisbeth S. Fried

16 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Lisbeth S. Fried
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • General Decision Sciences 72
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 208
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 104
  • Cultural Studies 61
  • Religious studies 29
Replace N. E. Wetherick with:
N. E. Wetherick United Kingdom
David P. O'Brien United States
Edward E. Smith United States
Stephanie Denison Canada
Wouter Voorspoels Belgium
Johan van der Auwera Belgium
Lloyd K. Komatsu United States
Matt Jones United States
Sergey V. Blok United States
Gary W. Cantor United States
Lisbeth S. Fried relative to N. E. Wetherick United Kingdom N. E. Wetherick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29×
N. E. Wetherick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth S. Fried

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth S. Fried's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth S. Fried with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth S. Fried more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth S. Fried

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth S. Fried. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth S. Fried. The network helps show where Lisbeth S. Fried may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Lisbeth S. Fried, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisbeth S. Fried Line = papers co-authored together Lisbeth S. Fried links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984250
2 198653
3 198438
4 198624
5 196923
6 200221
7 198913
8 196713
9 20028
10 20044
11 20144
12 20023
13 20042
14 20042
15 20021
16 20001
17 20091
18 20180
19 20180
20 20140

About Lisbeth S. Fried

Lisbeth S. Fried is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (11 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (8 papers), Ancient Near East History (6 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (5 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers), Language and cultural evolution (2 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (72 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (208 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (104 citations), Cultural Studies (61 citations) and Religious studies (29 citations). Lisbeth S. Fried has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Keith J. Holyoak, Michael J. Flannagan, Cameron R. Peterson, Stephen E. Glickman, John M. Eisenberg, John C. Hershey, Mark Young, Sankey V. Williams and Thomas ̈Römer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Journal of Biblical Literature, Harvard Theological Review, Journal for the Study of the Old Testament and Medical Decision Making.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact