Edward E. Smith

11 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers

Edward E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 113
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 107
  • General Decision Sciences 13
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 76
  • Cultural Studies 26
Replace Gary W. Cantor with:
Gary W. Cantor United States
J. M. Bocheński Poland
Keith Gunderson United States
George Botterill United Kingdom
Lawrence Foster United States
Thom Scott‐Phillips United Kingdom
Stephen P. Schwartz United States
I. J. Gelb
Noam Chomsky United States
Kemp Malone United States
Edward E. Smith relative to Gary W. Cantor United States Gary W. Cantor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gary W. Cantor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward E. Smith. The network helps show where Edward E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Edward E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Edward E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1988186
2 199635
3 198124
4
The exemplar view
200219
5 197814
6 199113
7 197611
8
A Stone's throw from Kimmswick: Clovis period research in Kentucky
19969
9 19685
10
The Swan's Landing site (12HR304) : an early archaic (Kirk Horizon) site in Harrison County, South-Central Indiana
19952
11 19681
12 19691
13
Der junge Stalin
19690

About Edward E. Smith

Edward E. Smith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Paleontology, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 13 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (3 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (3 papers), Soviet and Russian History (2 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (2 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (1 paper), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper) and German History and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (113 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (107 citations), General Decision Sciences (13 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (76 citations) and Cultural Studies (26 citations). Edward E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lance J. Rips, Daniel N. Osherson, Margaret M. Keane, Douglas L. Medin, Kari Edwards, Kenneth B. Tankersley, Edward Joseph Shoben, George F. Kennan, Lynne M. Reder and Hiram Brownell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Slavic Review and The Russian Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact