Journal of Biblical Literature

40.7k citations
5.8k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies
    • Christian Theology and Mission
    • Theology and Canon Law Studies
  • Archeology top 0.5%
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies

Papers in

    • Biblical Studies and Interpretation 4.6k
    • Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 329
    • Theology and Canon Law Studies 329
    • Archaeology and Historical Studies 1.7k
    • Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 252

Journal of Biblical Literature

4.1k papers receiving 21.8k citations

Peers

Journal of Biblical Literature
Comparison fields: 5 of 171
  • Religious studies 29.9k
  • Archeology 15.3k
  • Development 2.9k
  • Classics 1.5k
  • Sociology and Political Science 18.4k
Replace Journal of the American Oriental Society with:
Journal of the American Oriental Society United States
Vetus Testamentum United States
Hispanic American Historical Review United States
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion United States
The Classical World United States
The Journal of Interdisciplinary History United States
The International Journal of African Historical Studies United States
Pacific Affairs United States
Journal of American History United States
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute United Kingdom
Journal of Biblical Literature relative to Journal of the American Oriental Society United States Journal of the American Oriental Society's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Journal of the American Oriental Society · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Biblical Literature

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Biblical Literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Biblical Literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Biblical Literature more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Biblical Literature

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Biblical Literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Biblical Literature.

About Journal of Biblical Literature

The 5.8k papers published in Journal of Biblical Literature in the last decades have received a total of 40.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Biblical Literature usually cover Religious studies (4.7k papers), Archeology (1.9k papers), Development (342 papers), History (423 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (4.6k papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (1.7k papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (1.3k papers), Development, Ethics, and Society (342 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (329 papers), Theology and Canon Law Studies (329 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (307 papers) and Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (252 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Biblical Literature are Brevard S. Childs, Adela Yarbro Collins, Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza, Floyd V. Filson, Morton S. Enslin, John J. Collins, Otto A. Piper, Hans Dieter Betz, Ross Shepard Kraemer and Robert M. Grant.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact