Lior Sheffer

930 citations
26 papers · 470 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Lior Sheffer

23 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Lior Sheffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Communication 98
  • Political Science and International Relations 286
  • General Decision Sciences 19
  • Gender Studies 63
  • Public Administration 22
Replace Rasmus T. Pedersen with:
Rasmus T. Pedersen Denmark
Martin Bisgaard Denmark
Daniel R. Biggers United States
David Brockington United States
Martin Vinæs Larsen Denmark
Brad Lockerbie United States
Daniel Bischof Switzerland
Gregory J. Love United States
Willy Jou Japan
Laurel Harbridge‐Yong United States
Lior Sheffer relative to Rasmus T. Pedersen Denmark Rasmus T. Pedersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Rasmus T. Pedersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lior Sheffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lior Sheffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lior Sheffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lior Sheffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lior Sheffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lior Sheffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lior Sheffer. The network helps show where Lior Sheffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Lior Sheffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lior Sheffer Line = papers co-authored together Lior Sheffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017154
2 202253
3 202251
4 202031
5 201729
6 202324
7 202220
8 202319
9 201813
10 202311
11 20239
12 20198
13 20158
14 20248
15 20236
16 20245
17 20255
18 20194
19
Expertise and Efficacy in Elite Political Decision Making
20144
20 20223

About Lior Sheffer

Lior Sheffer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research, having authored 26 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (21 papers), Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (5 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (5 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (5 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (98 citations), Political Science and International Relations (286 citations), General Decision Sciences (19 citations), Gender Studies (63 citations) and Public Administration (22 citations). Lior Sheffer has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Canada and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Peter John Loewen, Stefaan Walgrave, Stuart Soroka, Tamir Sheafer, Noam Gidron, Frédéric Varone, Jean‐Benoît Pilet, Luzia Helfer, Rens Vliegenthart and Stefanie Bailer. Their work appears in journals such as Electoral Studies, American Political Science Review, Political Psychology, Political Behavior and European Journal of Political Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact