Lior Sheffer

850 citations
25 papers · 414 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Lior Sheffer

22 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers

Lior Sheffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Communication 90
  • Political Science and International Relations 262
  • General Decision Sciences 19
  • Public Administration 24
  • Gender Studies 63
Replace Rasmus T. Pedersen with:
Rasmus T. Pedersen Denmark
Martin Bisgaard Denmark
David Brockington United States
Daniel R. Biggers United States
Buddy Peyton United States
Karol Edward Sołtan United States
Brad Lockerbie United States
Daniel Bischof Switzerland
Susumu Shikano Germany
Willy Jou Japan
Lior Sheffer relative to Rasmus T. Pedersen Denmark Rasmus T. Pedersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Rasmus T. Pedersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lior Sheffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lior Sheffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lior Sheffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lior Sheffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lior Sheffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lior Sheffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lior Sheffer. The network helps show where Lior Sheffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Lior Sheffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lior Sheffer Line = papers co-authored together Lior Sheffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017143
2 202245
3 202244
4 202028
5 201724
6 202220
7 202316
8 202315
9 201811
10 202311
11 20159
12 20198
13 20237
14 20247
15 20245
16 20255
17 20234
18
Expertise and Efficacy in Elite Political Decision Making
20144
19 20223
20 20242

About Lior Sheffer

Lior Sheffer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Gender Studies and Safety Research, having authored 25 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (20 papers), Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (5 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (5 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (90 citations), Political Science and International Relations (262 citations), General Decision Sciences (19 citations), Public Administration (24 citations) and Gender Studies (63 citations). Lior Sheffer has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Canada and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Peter John Loewen, Stefaan Walgrave, Stuart Soroka, Tamir Sheafer, Noam Gidron, Frédéric Varone, Jean‐Benoît Pilet, Rens Vliegenthart, Luzia Helfer and Christian Breunig. Their work appears in journals such as Electoral Studies, American Political Science Review, Political Psychology, Political Behavior and European Journal of Political Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact