Lior Sheffer
Impact in
- Communication top 5%
- Social Media and Politics
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
Papers in
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 19
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements 5
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 4
-
- Social and Cultural Dynamics 5
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 5
- Co-authors
- Peter John Loewen (11 shared papers)Stefaan Walgrave (8 shared papers)Stuart Soroka (2 shared papers)Tamir Sheafer (1 shared paper)Noam Gidron (5 shared papers)Frédéric Varone (6 shared papers)Jean‐Benoît Pilet (5 shared papers)Rens Vliegenthart (4 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Lior Sheffer
22 papers receiving 363 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Communication 83
- Political Science and International Relations 245
- General Decision Sciences 19
- Public Administration 24
- Gender Studies 60
Countries citing papers authored by Lior Sheffer
This map shows the geographic impact of Lior Sheffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lior Sheffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lior Sheffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lior Sheffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lior Sheffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lior Sheffer. The network helps show where Lior Sheffer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Lior Sheffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 141 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 16 | Expertise and Efficacy in Elite Political Decision Making | 2014 | 4 |
| 17 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 2 |
About Lior Sheffer
Lior Sheffer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Communication, Gender Studies and Safety Research, having authored 24 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (19 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (5 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (5 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (83 citations), Political Science and International Relations (245 citations), General Decision Sciences (19 citations), Public Administration (24 citations) and Gender Studies (60 citations). Lior Sheffer has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Canada and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Peter John Loewen, Stefaan Walgrave, Stuart Soroka, Tamir Sheafer, Noam Gidron, Frédéric Varone, Jean‐Benoît Pilet, Rens Vliegenthart, Luzia Helfer and Stefanie Bailer. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, Electoral Studies, Political Psychology, European Journal of Political Research and Political Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.