Daniel Bischof

1.3k citations
24 papers · 754 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Bischof

24 papers receiving 721 citations

Peers

Daniel Bischof
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Political Science and International Relations 542
  • Communication 149
  • Gender Studies 107
  • Strategy and Management 135
  • Sociology and Political Science 305
Replace Filip Kostelka with:
Filip Kostelka United Kingdom
Zoe Lefkofridi Austria
Willy Jou Japan
Ferrán Martínez i Coma Australia
Sílvia M. Mendes Portugal
Andrew Rehfeld United States
Mitchell S. Sanders United States
Henrik Oscarsson Sweden
Brad Lockerbie United States
Elin Naurin Sweden
Daniel Bischof relative to Filip Kostelka United Kingdom Filip Kostelka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Filip Kostelka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Bischof

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Bischof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Bischof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Bischof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Bischof

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Bischof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Bischof. The network helps show where Daniel Bischof may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Bischof, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Bischof Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Bischof links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017155
2 2019125
3 201291
4 201789
5 201569
6 202133
7 201730
8 201723
9 202022
10 202115
11 201914
12 201514
13 201713
14 202112
15 202312
16 201711
17 20237
18 20234
19 20214
20 20234

About Daniel Bischof

Daniel Bischof is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Public Administration, having authored 24 papers that have together received 754 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (15 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (8 papers), Social Media and Politics (7 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (5 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (4 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (2 papers) and Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (542 citations), Communication (149 citations), Gender Studies (107 citations), Strategy and Management (135 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (305 citations). Daniel Bischof has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Markus Wagner, Roman Senninger, Thomas Saalfeld, Florian Foos, Luca Bernardi, Simon Fink, Ruud Wouters, Laura Morales, Fabio Wolkenstein and Lawrence Ezrow. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Politics, American Political Science Review, Swiss Political Science Review, West European Politics and Political Science Research and Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact