Brad Lockerbie

906 citations
33 papers · 529 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Brad Lockerbie

31 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers

Brad Lockerbie
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Political Science and International Relations 402
  • Communication 116
  • Gender Studies 58
  • Strategy and Management 82
  • Public Administration 18
Replace Lyn Ragsdale with:
Lyn Ragsdale United States
J. Matthew Wilson United States
Matthew Mendelsohn Canada
John H. Kessel United States
François Pétry Canada
David B. Holian United States
Stanley Kelley United States
Elizabeth N. Saunders United States
Patrick Dunleavy United Kingdom
Matthew N. Beckmann United States
Brad Lockerbie relative to Lyn Ragsdale United States Lyn Ragsdale's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lyn Ragsdale · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brad Lockerbie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brad Lockerbie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brad Lockerbie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brad Lockerbie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brad Lockerbie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brad Lockerbie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brad Lockerbie. The network helps show where Brad Lockerbie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Brad Lockerbie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brad Lockerbie Line = papers co-authored together Brad Lockerbie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199493
2 199342
3 198939
4 199237
5 199832
6 201830
7 199128
8 201722
9 198718
10 198917
11 200815
12 201214
13 200614
14 199014
15 201312
16 199112
17
Do Voters Look to the Future?: Economics and Elections
200811
18 199511
19 20029
20 20089

About Brad Lockerbie

Brad Lockerbie is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 33 papers that have together received 529 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (23 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (9 papers), Policy Transfer and Learning (4 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (3 papers), Media Influence and Politics (3 papers) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (402 citations), Communication (116 citations), Gender Studies (58 citations), Strategy and Management (82 citations) and Public Administration (18 citations). Brad Lockerbie has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Stephen A. Borrelli, Michael S. Lewis‐Beck, Jody C Baumgartner, Richard G. Niemi, James L. Regens, Ronald Keith Gaddie, Charles Tien, Andreas Graefe, Alfred G. Cuzán and Bruno Jérôme. Their work appears in journals such as PS Political Science & Politics, Political Research Quarterly, Social Science Quarterly, Public Opinion Quarterly and American Politics Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact