Buddy Peyton

9 papers receiving 424 citations

Buddy Peyton's Hit Papers

Same Facts, Different Interpretations: Partisan Motivation and Opinion on Iraq 2007 · 376 citations
3760+6+12Years since publication100200300

Peers

Buddy Peyton
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Communication 138
  • Political Science and International Relations 260
  • Sociology and Political Science 312
  • Public Administration 12
  • Gender Studies 25
Replace Matthew Graham with:
Matthew Graham United States
Vincenzo Memoli Italy
Gregory J. Love United States
Willy Jou Japan
Kjersten Nelson United States
Christopher Hare United States
Matías Bargsted Chile
Matthias Fatke Germany
Henrik Oscarsson Sweden
William Minozzi United States
Buddy Peyton relative to Matthew Graham United States Matthew Graham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Matthew Graham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Buddy Peyton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Buddy Peyton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Buddy Peyton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Buddy Peyton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Buddy Peyton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Buddy Peyton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Buddy Peyton. The network helps show where Buddy Peyton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Buddy Peyton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Buddy Peyton Line = papers co-authored together Buddy Peyton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown

About Buddy Peyton

Buddy Peyton is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Computer Networks and Communications, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 461 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Conflict and Governance (2 papers), Comparative and International Law Studies (1 paper), Economic Growth and Development (1 paper), Evolving Legal Systems and Governance (1 paper), Health and Conflict Studies (1 paper), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (1 paper), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (1 paper) and Media Influence and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (138 citations), Political Science and International Relations (260 citations), Sociology and Political Science (312 citations), Public Administration (12 citations) and Gender Studies (25 citations). Buddy Peyton has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jay Verkuilen, James H. Kuklinski, Paul J. Quirk, Brian J. Gaines, Peter F. Nardulli, Carolyn J. Anderson, Scott L. Althaus, John Carter and Michael R. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Politics, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, American Behavioral Scientist, Journal of Conflict Resolution and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact