Lilith A. Whiley

422 citations
23 papers · 283 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Lilith A. Whiley

22 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Lilith A. Whiley
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Gender Studies 66
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 55
  • Health 22
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 6
  • Sociology and Political Science 106
Replace Tres Stefurak with:
Tres Stefurak United States
Philip E. Carlan United States
Sarah Charman United Kingdom
Hyunin Baek United States
René Moelker Netherlands
Frank Mierzwa United States
Weston J. Morrow United States
Ryan Kelty United States
Morris Jenkins United States
Jessica A. Gallus United States
Lilith A. Whiley relative to Tres Stefurak United States Tres Stefurak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tres Stefurak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lilith A. Whiley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lilith A. Whiley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lilith A. Whiley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lilith A. Whiley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lilith A. Whiley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lilith A. Whiley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lilith A. Whiley. The network helps show where Lilith A. Whiley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Lilith A. Whiley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lilith A. Whiley Line = papers co-authored together Lilith A. Whiley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201678
2 202139
3 202034
4 202229
5 202026
6 202016
7 202311
8 20218
9 20208
10 20235
11 20184
12 20214
13 20194
14 20233
15 20223
16 20213
17 20242
18 20232
19 20231
20 20211

About Lilith A. Whiley

Lilith A. Whiley is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Clinical Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (9 papers), Coaching Methods and Impact (4 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (4 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (3 papers) and Policing Practices and Perceptions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (66 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (55 citations), Health (22 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (6 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (106 citations). Lilith A. Whiley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kerstin Alfes, Amanda Shantz, Marie Juanchich, Sarah E. Stutterheim, Gina Grandy, Miroslav Sirota, Rhea Ashley Hoskin, A. Dickson Wright, Jonathan E. Booth and Rachel Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Gender Work and Organization, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, International Journal of Police Science & Management, Organizational Behavior Teaching Review and Personnel Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact