Liling Wang

723 citations
54 papers · 545 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls 3
    • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 6
    • Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities 4

Liling Wang

50 papers receiving 538 citations

Peers

Liling Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Biochemistry 44
  • Filtration and Separation 15
  • Analytical Chemistry 60
  • Catalysis 38
  • Food Science 92
Replace Hao Tian with:
Hao Tian China
Ting-Fu Jiang China
Dajana Gašo-Sokač Croatia
Cassandra Breil France
Aiping Yan China
Chunhui Ma China
Nevcihan Gürsoy Türkiye
Daniel Rinaldo Brazil
Rohit Sharma India
Dayun Zhao China
Liling Wang relative to Hao Tian China Hao Tian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hao Tian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liling Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liling Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liling Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liling Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liling Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liling Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liling Wang. The network helps show where Liling Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liling Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liling Wang Line = papers co-authored together Liling Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201843
2 201533
3 200431
4 201926
5 202226
6 201925
7 202221
8 201919
9 202219
10 202418
11 202217
12 202416
13 202016
14 201315
15 201615
16 202213
17 202312
18 202212
19 201312
20 202111

About Liling Wang

Liling Wang is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Food Science, Biomedical Engineering and Biochemistry, having authored 54 papers that have together received 545 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (6 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (6 papers), Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Microbial Metabolism and Applications (3 papers), Medicinal plant effects and applications (3 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (3 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (44 citations), Filtration and Separation (15 citations), Analytical Chemistry (60 citations), Catalysis (38 citations) and Food Science (92 citations). Liling Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Yifeng Zhou, Yuchuan Qin, Yanbin Wang, Meixu Chen, Yanbin Wang, Yifeng Zhou, Haibo Li, Yanbin Wang, Hailong Wei and Jianwei Mao. Their work appears in journals such as LWT, Foods, Molecules, Microchemical Journal and RSC Advances.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact