Liam Watson

646 citations
24 papers · 183 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Liam Watson

21 papers receiving 173 citations

Peers

Liam Watson
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Geometry and Topology 167
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 53
  • Mathematical Physics 135
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 41
  • Neurology 31
Replace Joshua Evan Greene with:
Joshua Evan Greene United States
Zhongtao Wu Hong Kong
Yuri Chekanov Russia
Tara Brendle United States
Kimihiko Motegi Japan
Marta Asaeda United States
Shicheng Wang China
Emmanuel Giroux France
Anh T. Tran United States
Ken’ichi Ohshika Japan
Liam Watson relative to Joshua Evan Greene United States Joshua Evan Greene's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Joshua Evan Greene · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Liam Watson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Liam Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liam Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liam Watson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Liam Watson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Liam Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Liam Watson. The network helps show where Liam Watson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Liam Watson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Liam Watson Line = papers co-authored together Liam Watson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201274
2 201312
3 201211
4 202211
5 201010
6
Graph manifolds, left-orderability and amalgamation
20169
7 20238
8 20078
9 20226
10 20245
11 20235
12 20064
13 20143
14 20173
15 20103
16
Optimization and nonlinear equations
20002
17
NON-FIBERED L-SPACE KNOTS
20162
18 20232
19 20242
20 20222

About Liam Watson

Liam Watson is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Neurology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 183 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (20 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (19 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (8 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (3 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers), semigroups and automata theory (3 papers), 2D Materials and Applications (2 papers) and Topological Materials and Phenomena (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (167 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (53 citations), Mathematical Physics (135 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (41 citations) and Neurology (31 citations). Liam Watson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven Boyer, Joshua Evan Greene, Jacob Rasmussen, Matthew Hedden, Kaijian Xing, John Ford, M. C. Bartholomew‐Biggs, Michael S. Fuhrer, Iolanda Di Bernardo and Shao‐Yu Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematische Annalen, Algebraic & Geometric Topology, Geometry & Topology, Advanced Materials and Compositio Mathematica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact