John Ford

7.9k citations
135 papers · 4.2k · 1 hit paper · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

John Ford

125 papers receiving 4.0k citations

John Ford's Hit Papers

The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities 2020 · 1.2k citations
1.2k0+2+4Years since publication4008001.2k

Peers

John Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
  • Numerical Analysis 367
  • Modeling and Simulation 186
  • Health 280
  • General Health Professions 587
  • Ophthalmology 174
Replace Paul S. Levy with:
Paul S. Levy United States
William W. Davis United States
Steven A. Smith United States
Anita K. Wagner United States
Karan P. Singh United States
Michael J. Ward United States
Michael Green Canada
Maurizio Vanelli Italy
Benjamin Haaland United States
Mamas A. Mamas United Kingdom
John Ford relative to Paul S. Levy United States Paul S. Levy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×40×45.9×
Paul S. Levy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Ford. The network helps show where John Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Ford Line = papers co-authored together John Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 135 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities
Hit paper breakdown →
20201240
2 2014202
3 2011151
4 2016143
5 2017124
6 2013123
7 2011116
8 2011114
9 2011107
10 201393
11 202188
12 199484
13 196582
14 200474
15 201669
16 202165
17 201860
18 201658
19 196355
20 201251

About John Ford

John Ford is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Numerical Analysis, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Health and Organic Chemistry, having authored 135 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (17 papers), Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (17 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (10 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (9 papers), Numerical Methods and Algorithms (7 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers) and Matrix Theory and Algorithms (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (367 citations), Modeling and Simulation (186 citations), Health (280 citations), General Health Professions (587 citations) and Ophthalmology (174 citations). John Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Clare Bambra, Fiona E. Matthews, Ryan Riordan, Issam A. R. Moghrabi, Yasushi Narushima, Hiroshi Yabe, Mohamed Abdel‐Fattah, Alison Avenell, Graeme MacLennan and Nicholas Steel. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Computers & Mathematics with Applications and British Journal of General Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact