L.F. Lacey

36 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

L.F. Lacey
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Pharmaceutical Science 235
  • Medical Terminology 5
  • Gastroenterology 85
  • Statistics and Probability 116
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 138
Replace Barbara Schug with:
Barbara Schug Germany
Keith K. H. Chan United States
William H. Barr United States
Adrian Dunne Ireland
Hiroyasu Ogata Japan
Klaus Kutz Germany
Parviz Mojaverian United States
D. Brockmeier Germany
Kirstin Thelen Germany
J. Godbillon Switzerland
L.F. Lacey relative to Barbara Schug Germany Barbara Schug's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Barbara Schug · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L.F. Lacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L.F. Lacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L.F. Lacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L.F. Lacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L.F. Lacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L.F. Lacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L.F. Lacey. The network helps show where L.F. Lacey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L.F. Lacey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L.F. Lacey Line = papers co-authored together L.F. Lacey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995237
2 1997104
3 200198
4 200183
5 199582
6 199472
7 200266
8 200263
9 200359
10 199949
11 200045
12 200529
13
Economic evaluation of lamivudine compared with interferon-alpha in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in the United States.
200129
14
The cost-effectiveness of treatment with lamivudine and zidovudine compared with zidovudine alone: a comparison of Markov model and trial data estimates.
199823
15 199521
16 199118
17 200816
18 199914
19 199813
20 199412

About L.F. Lacey

L.F. Lacey is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Statistics and Probability, Infectious Diseases, Pharmacology and Pharmacology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (6 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (5 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (4 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (4 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (3 papers) and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (235 citations), Medical Terminology (5 citations), Gastroenterology (85 citations), Statistics and Probability (116 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (138 citations). L.F. Lacey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Abdul W. Basit, Oliver N. Keene, J. Michael Newton, Alan Bye, Peter J. Ell, Wendy A. Waddington, Bill Byrom, John McKellar, Kevin Gough and Michael G. Hutchison. Their work appears in journals such as PharmacoEconomics, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmaceutical Research, Drug Information Journal and European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact