Bill Byrom

53 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Bill Byrom
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Applied Psychology 59
  • Statistics and Probability 93
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 48
  • Physiology 112
  • Family Practice 7
Replace Laura Flight with:
Laura Flight United Kingdom
Adelin Albert Belgium
Munyaradzi Dimairo United Kingdom
Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen Denmark
Michael L. Cohen United States
William Whang United States
Alexander Kaizer United States
Tsai‐Wei Huang Taiwan
Handan Ankaralı Türkiye
Steven C. Bagley United States
Bill Byrom relative to Laura Flight United Kingdom Laura Flight's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Laura Flight · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bill Byrom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bill Byrom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill Byrom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill Byrom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bill Byrom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill Byrom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill Byrom. The network helps show where Bill Byrom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bill Byrom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bill Byrom Line = papers co-authored together Bill Byrom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995237
2 1998120
3 201679
4 201861
5 201659
6 201856
7 201754
8 201737
9 202037
10 200033
11 202132
12
ePro: Electronic Solutions for Patient-Reported Data
201030
13 202225
14 201822
15 200418
16 202017
17 201817
18 201816
19 200115
20 199915

About Bill Byrom

Bill Byrom is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Economics and Econometrics and Physiology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (9 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (8 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Physical Activity and Health (3 papers), Social Media in Health Education (3 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (3 papers) and Optimal Experimental Design Methods (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (59 citations), Statistics and Probability (93 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (48 citations), Physiology (112 citations) and Family Practice (7 citations). Bill Byrom has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Willie Muehlhausen, Marie Mc Carthy, David A. Rowe, L.F. Lacey, John McKellar, Kevin Gough, Oliver N. Keene, Michael G. Hutchison, Alison Carr and Philip Breedon. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, Contemporary Clinical Trials, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Journal of Medical Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact