Leo E. Strine
Impact in
- Accounting top 5%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Corporate Insolvency and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Private Equity and Venture Capital
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Corporate Governance and Law
- Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Papers in
- Accounting 22
- Corporate Insolvency and Governance 21
-
- Corporate Governance and Law 17
- Co-authors
- Nicholas D. Walter (3 shared papers)William T. Allen (4 shared papers)Chris Brummer (1 shared paper)Jonathan R. Macey (1 shared paper)Bruce Kogut (1 shared paper)Mark J. Roe (1 shared paper)Sean J. Griffith (1 shared paper)Melissa M. Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review (2 papers)Cornell law review/The Cornell law quarterly (1 paper)Minnesota law review (1 paper)Northwestern University law review (1 paper)Stanford Law Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyBelgium
In The Last Decade
Leo E. Strine
43 papers receiving 308 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Accounting 230
- Strategy and Management 168
- Finance 75
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 76
- Law 39
Countries citing papers authored by Leo E. Strine
This map shows the geographic impact of Leo E. Strine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leo E. Strine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leo E. Strine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Leo E. Strine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leo E. Strine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leo E. Strine. The network helps show where Leo E. Strine may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Leo E. Strine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Dangers of Denial: The Need for a Clear-Eyed Understanding of the Power and Accountability Structure Established by the Delaware General Corporation Law | 2015 | 36 |
| 2 | Toward a True Corporate Republic: A Traditional Response to Lucian's Solutions for Improving Corporate America | 2006 | 27 |
| 3 | 2006 | 25 | |
| 4 | Our Continuing Struggle with the Idea that For-Profit Corporations Seek Profit | 2012 | 23 |
| 5 | Can We Do Better by Ordinary Investors? A Pragmatic Reaction to the Dueling Ideological Mythologists of Corporate Law | 2014 | 23 |
| 6 | Making it Easier for Directors to 'Do the Right Thing'? | 2014 | 21 |
| 7 | Toward Common Sense and Common Ground? Reflections on the Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in a More Rational System of Corporate Governance | 2007 | 21 |
| 8 | 2003 | 21 | |
| 9 | The Delaware Way: How We Do Corporate Law and Some of the New Challenges We (and Europe) Face | 2006 | 18 |
| 10 | Loyalty's Core Demand: The Defining Role of Good Faith in Corporation Law | 2009 | 12 |
| 11 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 12 | Derivative Impact? Some Early Reflections on the Corporation Law Implications of the Enron Debacle | 2002 | 11 |
| 13 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 14 | Who Bleeds When the Wolves Bite? A Flesh-and-Blood Perspective on Hedge Fund Activism and Our Strange Corporate Governance System | 2017 | 10 |
| 15 | Restoration: The Role Stakeholder Governance Must Play in Recreating a Fair and Sustainable American Economy - A Reply to Professor Rock | 2020 | 9 |
| 16 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 17 | Conservative Collision Course: The Tension between Conservative Corporate Law Theory and Citizens United | 2015 | 7 |
| 18 | Delaware Corporate Law and the Model Business Corporation Act: A Study in Symbiosis | 2011 | 7 |
| 19 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 20 | Realigning the Standard of Review of Director Due Care with Delaware Public Policy: A Critique of Van Gorkom and Its Progeny as a Standard of Review Problem | 2002 | 6 |
About Leo E. Strine
Leo E. Strine is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management, Law, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 57 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Insolvency and Governance (21 papers), Corporate Governance and Law (17 papers), Corporate Law and Human Rights (14 papers), Property Rights and Legal Doctrine (12 papers), Legal principles and applications (10 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (4 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (4 papers) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (230 citations), Strategy and Management (168 citations), Finance (75 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (76 citations) and Law (39 citations). Leo E. Strine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas D. Walter, William T. Allen, Chris Brummer, Jonathan R. Macey, Bruce Kogut, Mark J. Roe, Sean J. Griffith, Melissa M. Smith, Jill E. Fisch and Eric L. Talley. Their work appears in journals such as University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Cornell law review/The Cornell law quarterly, Minnesota law review, Northwestern University law review and Stanford Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.