Ingo Saenger
Impact in
-
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Corporate Insolvency and Governance
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
-
- Corporate Governance and Law
- Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Papers in
-
- Corporate Governance and Law 8
- Diverse Legal and Medical Studies 1
-
- Corporate Finance and Governance 1
- Taxation and Legal Issues 1
- Co-authors
- Jean Jacques du Plessis (3 shared papers)Bernhard Großfeld (3 shared papers)Richard W. Foster (1 shared paper)Michael D. Kogan (1 shared paper)C. Papadas (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- European Business Law Review (1 paper)European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht (1 paper)Deakin Law Review (1 paper)Neue Juristische Wochenschrift: NJW (1 paper)CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Ingo Saenger
8 papers receiving 52 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Accounting 37
- Strategy and Management 29
- Gender Studies 14
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 14
- Finance 7
Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Saenger
This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Saenger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Saenger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Saenger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Saenger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Saenger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Saenger. The network helps show where Ingo Saenger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ingo Saenger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 6 | Erstattungsfähigkeit anwaltlicher Zeithonorare | 2014 | 1 |
| 7 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 0 |
About Ingo Saenger
Ingo Saenger is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Accounting, Political Science and International Relations, Law and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 13 papers that have together received 60 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Governance and Law (8 papers), Law and Political Science (2 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (1 paper), Diverse Legal and Medical Studies (1 paper), Corporate Finance and Governance (1 paper), Radiation Effects in Electronics (1 paper), Taxation and Legal Issues (1 paper) and Legal Issues in Turkey (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (37 citations), Strategy and Management (29 citations), Gender Studies (14 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (14 citations) and Finance (7 citations). Ingo Saenger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jean Jacques du Plessis, Bernhard Großfeld, Richard W. Foster, Michael D. Kogan and C. Papadas. Their work appears in journals such as European Business Law Review, European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht, Deakin Law Review, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift: NJW and CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.