Science in Context

780 papers and 6.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 780 papers published in Science in Context in the last decades have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Science in Context usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (357 papers), Sociology and Political Science (123 papers) and History (106 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and History of Science (120 papers), History of Science and Medicine (97 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (89 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Science in Context are Steven Shapin, Simon Schaffer, Lorraine Daston, Eric Winsberg, Theodore M. Porter, Adi Ophir, Michael Lynch, Rudolf Stichweh, Lily E. Kay and Sergio Sismondo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Science in Context

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Science in Context. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Science in Context.

Countries where authors publish in Science in Context

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Science in Context. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Science in Context with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science in Context more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025