Science in Context

776 papers and 6.5k indexed citations

About

The 776 papers published in Science in Context in the last decades have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Science in Context usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (354 papers), Sociology and Political Science (124 papers) and History (104 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and History of Science (119 papers), History of Science and Medicine (97 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (87 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Science in Context are Steven Shapin, Simon Schaffer, Lorraine Daston, Eric Winsberg, Theodore M. Porter, Adi Ophir, Michael Lynch, Rudolf Stichweh, Sergio Sismondo and Shaun Gallagher.

In The Last Decade

Science in Context

633 papers receiving 5.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Science in Context

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Science in Context. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Science in Context.

Countries where authors publish in Science in Context

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Science in Context. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Science in Context with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science in Context more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026