Lena Scott

1.5k citations
36 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

    • Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Biophysics top 2%
    • Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques

Papers in

Lena Scott

35 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Lena Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Structural Biology 80
  • Biophysics 123
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 327
  • Nephrology 78
  • Molecular Biology 499
Replace Verena C. Wimmer with:
Verena C. Wimmer Australia
Brian Glancy United States
Alexander A. Bondar Russia
H. Y. Elder United Kingdom
David J. Crossman New Zealand
Jürgen Hench Switzerland
Roger Rick Germany
Osamu Satō Japan
Eichi Yamada Japan
Michael S. Forbes United States
Lena Scott relative to Verena C. Wimmer Australia Verena C. Wimmer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.6×
Verena C. Wimmer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lena Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lena Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lena Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lena Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lena Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lena Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lena Scott. The network helps show where Lena Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lena Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lena Scott Line = papers co-authored together Lena Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002125
2 2011119
3 200692
4 201571
5 200268
6
Neutralizing antibodies to human interleukin 6 reverse hypercalcemia associated with a human squamous carcinoma.
199367
7 200865
8 201653
9 201750
10 200845
11 201238
12 201137
13 200834
14 201131
15 200423
16 201921
17 200720
18 200320
19 201219
20 202019

About Lena Scott

Lena Scott is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Nephrology, Cell Biology and Biophysics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (13 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (7 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (4 papers), Biomedical Research and Pathophysiology (3 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (3 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (3 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (80 citations), Biophysics (123 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (327 citations), Nephrology (78 citations) and Molecular Biology (499 citations). Lena Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Anita Aperia, Hjalmar Brismar, Hans Blom, Paul Greengard, Hans Forssberg, Sergey Zelenin, David Unnersjö‐Jess, María Sol Kruse, Jerker Widengren and Daniel Rönnlund. Their work appears in journals such as Kidney International, Neuroscience, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Pediatric Research and Physics in Medicine and Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact