Lee Ellis

147 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Lee Ellis
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.3k
  • Gender Studies 546
  • Social Psychology 1.1k
  • Health 300
  • Clinical Psychology 727
Replace Helen Fisher with:
Helen Fisher United States
Anne Campbell United Kingdom
Coren L. Apicella United States
Christopher von Rueden United States
Jerome H. Barkow Canada
Carlos Navarrete United States
Peter B. Gray United States
Martie G. Haselton United States
Willem E. Frankenhuis Netherlands
Carol Nagy Jacklin United States
Lee Ellis relative to Helen Fisher United States Helen Fisher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Helen Fisher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lee Ellis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lee Ellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lee Ellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lee Ellis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lee Ellis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lee Ellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lee Ellis. The network helps show where Lee Ellis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lee Ellis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lee Ellis Line = papers co-authored together Lee Ellis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 159 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995411
2 1987247
3 2020152
4
Social stratification and socioeconomic inequality
1993145
5 1991113
6 1991101
7 2001100
8 198891
9 198781
10 201278
11 199175
12 199074
13 198568
14 198766
15 200165
16
Research Methods in the Social Sciences
199463
17 200562
18
Criminology: A Global Perspective
200062
19 201258
20
Sexual Orientation: Toward Biological Understanding
199757

About Lee Ellis

Lee Ellis is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Molecular Biology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 159 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (38 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (16 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (16 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (13 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (11 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (10 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (9 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.3k citations), Gender Studies (546 citations), Social Psychology (1.1k citations), Health (300 citations) and Clinical Psychology (727 citations). Lee Ellis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Melissa Ames, Anthony Walsh, Kelly H. Soanes, Pauline B. Bart, Ray Blanchard, Denis J. Dupré, John C. Achenbach, Robert Dunn, Stephen K. Sanderson and Charles Beattie. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Mankind Quarterly, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Frontiers in Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact