Melissa Ames
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Health top 5%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Papers in
-
- Media Studies and Communication 3
- Social Media and Politics 1
-
- Sex work and related issues 2
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 2
- Marriage and Sexual Relationships 1
- Co-authors
- Cathy Spatz Widom (1 shared paper)Lee Ellis (2 shared papers)David A. Houston (1 shared paper)Lee M. Ellis (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Archives of Sexual Behavior (2 papers)Child Abuse & Neglect (1 paper)The Journal of Popular Culture (1 paper)Psychological Bulletin (1 paper)The Journal of Sex Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Melissa Ames
14 papers receiving 695 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Clinical Psychology 389
- Health 149
- Gender Studies 146
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 124
- Social Psychology 159
Countries citing papers authored by Melissa Ames
This map shows the geographic impact of Melissa Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melissa Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melissa Ames more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melissa Ames
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melissa Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melissa Ames. The network helps show where Melissa Ames may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Melissa Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 338 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 247 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 59 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 35 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1990 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 11 | Time in Television Narrative: Exploring Temporality in Twenty-First-Century Programming | 2012 | 4 |
| 12 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 14 | Small Screen, Big Feels: Television and Cultural Anxiety in the Twenty-First Century | 2020 | 1 |
| 15 | Memoirs of a Bathroom Stall: The Women’s Lavatory as Crying Room, Confessional, and Sanctuary | 2006 | 0 |
About Melissa Ames
Melissa Ames is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 15 papers that have together received 779 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Media Studies and Communication (3 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (1 paper) and Social Media and Politics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (389 citations), Health (149 citations), Gender Studies (146 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (124 citations) and Social Psychology (159 citations). Melissa Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Cathy Spatz Widom, Lee Ellis, David A. Houston and Lee M. Ellis. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Sexual Behavior, Child Abuse & Neglect, The Journal of Popular Culture, Psychological Bulletin and The Journal of Sex Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.