Leah Jackson‐Blake

1.0k citations
27 papers · 668 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Leah Jackson‐Blake

26 papers receiving 662 citations

Peers

Leah Jackson‐Blake
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Environmental Chemistry 329
  • Water Science and Technology 276
  • Soil Science 118
  • Oceanography 107
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 47
Replace Amy T. Hansen with:
Amy T. Hansen United States
Jason G. Kerr Canada
Anna Lupon Spain
David Waters Australia
Jonathan M. Abell New Zealand
David Brito Portugal
Teija Kirkkala Finland
James Sample Norway
José L. J. Ledesma Sweden
Kristen L. Underwood United States
Leah Jackson‐Blake relative to Amy T. Hansen United States Amy T. Hansen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Amy T. Hansen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leah Jackson‐Blake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leah Jackson‐Blake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leah Jackson‐Blake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leah Jackson‐Blake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leah Jackson‐Blake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leah Jackson‐Blake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leah Jackson‐Blake. The network helps show where Leah Jackson‐Blake may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leah Jackson‐Blake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leah Jackson‐Blake Line = papers co-authored together Leah Jackson‐Blake links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014204
2 201754
3 201650
4 201435
5 201533
6 201832
7 201429
8 202228
9 201527
10 202122
11 202320
12 201918
13 201518
14 202217
15 201217
16 202016
17 20139
18 20219
19 20229
20
Spatial and temporal trends of mercury in freshwater fish in Fennoscandia (1965-2015)
20177

About Leah Jackson‐Blake

Leah Jackson‐Blake is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Water Science and Technology, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 668 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (13 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (12 papers), Hydrological Forecasting Using AI (5 papers), Water resources management and optimization (4 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (3 papers), Water Quality and Pollution Assessment (3 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (3 papers) and Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (329 citations), Water Science and Technology (276 citations), Soil Science (118 citations), Oceanography (107 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (47 citations). Leah Jackson‐Blake has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Helliwell, James Sample, Andrew J. Wade, R. A. Skeffington, Uwe Fischer, A.J. Lawlor, Edward Tipping, Jessica Davies, Hannah Toberman and John Boyle. Their work appears in journals such as Hydrology and earth system sciences, Water, Environmental Modelling & Software, Landscape and Urban Planning and Global Biogeochemical Cycles.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact