Laurie E. Comstock
Impact in
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Vibrio bacteria research studies
- Escherichia coli research studies
- Molecular Medicine top 10%
Papers in
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 7
- Gut microbiota and health 5
-
- Vibrio bacteria research studies 3
- Escherichia coli research studies 2
- Co-authors
- Leonor García-Bayona (5 shared papers)Michael J. Coyne (9 shared papers)Katja G. Weinacht (2 shared papers)Maria Chatzidaki‐Livanis (1 shared paper)Hazeline Roche (1 shared paper)Julian Parkhill (1 shared paper)Leigh M. Matano (1 shared paper)Paula Montero Llopis (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- mBio (2 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Journal of Bacteriology (2 papers)Nature Communications (1 paper)Microbiology Spectrum (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Laurie E. Comstock
12 papers receiving 825 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Endocrinology 151
- Molecular Medicine 61
- Infectious Diseases 178
- Food Science 169
- Molecular Biology 536
Countries citing papers authored by Laurie E. Comstock
This map shows the geographic impact of Laurie E. Comstock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurie E. Comstock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurie E. Comstock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laurie E. Comstock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurie E. Comstock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurie E. Comstock. The network helps show where Laurie E. Comstock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Laurie E. Comstock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 258 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 111 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 81 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 80 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 71 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 60 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 42 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 42 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 4 |
About Laurie E. Comstock
Laurie E. Comstock is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Food Science, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 830 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (7 papers), Gut microbiota and health (5 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (4 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (3 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (3 papers), Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (3 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers) and Escherichia coli research studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (151 citations), Molecular Medicine (61 citations), Infectious Diseases (178 citations), Food Science (169 citations) and Molecular Biology (536 citations). Laurie E. Comstock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Leonor García-Bayona, Michael J. Coyne, Katja G. Weinacht, Maria Chatzidaki‐Livanis, Hazeline Roche, Julian Parkhill, Leigh M. Matano, Paula Montero Llopis, Michael H. Malamy and Takeshi Ito. Their work appears in journals such as mBio, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Bacteriology, Nature Communications and Microbiology Spectrum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.