Laura Schroeter
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 20
- Philosophy 19
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 15
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 7
- Co-authors
- François Schroeter (17 shared papers)Karen Jones (1 shared paper)Karen L. Jones (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Australasian Journal of Philosophy (4 papers)Noûs (2 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Canadian Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)Synthese (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Laura Schroeter
26 papers receiving 235 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Philosophy 188
- History and Philosophy of Science 61
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 165
- Cognitive Neuroscience 71
- Language and Linguistics 22
Countries citing papers authored by Laura Schroeter
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Schroeter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Schroeter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Schroeter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Schroeter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Schroeter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Schroeter. The network helps show where Laura Schroeter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Laura Schroeter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 37 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 3 | Normative Concepts: A Connectedness Model | 2014 | 24 |
| 4 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 10 | |
| 11 | Normative realism: co-reference without convergence? | 2013 | 9 |
| 12 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 13 | Semantic Deference versus Semantic Coordination | 2016 | 6 |
| 14 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 3 |
About Laura Schroeter
Laura Schroeter is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 29 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (20 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (15 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (11 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (2 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (188 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (61 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (165 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (71 citations) and Language and Linguistics (22 citations). Laura Schroeter has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include François Schroeter, Karen Jones and Karen L. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Noûs, Philosophical Studies, Canadian Journal of Philosophy and Synthese.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.