Bob Beddor
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 29
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 29
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 15
- Co-authors
- Carlotta Pavese (5 shared papers)Simon Goldstein (3 shared papers)Andy Egan (1 shared paper)Paul Henne (1 shared paper)Finnur Dellsén (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Philosophical Quarterly (4 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (3 papers)Philosophical Studies (3 papers)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (3 papers)The Review of Symbolic Logic (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited StatesSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Bob Beddor
28 papers receiving 268 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Philosophy 274
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 144
- Family Practice 12
- Cognitive Neuroscience 121
- History and Philosophy of Science 30
Countries citing papers authored by Bob Beddor
This map shows the geographic impact of Bob Beddor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bob Beddor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bob Beddor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bob Beddor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bob Beddor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bob Beddor. The network helps show where Bob Beddor may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Bob Beddor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 44 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 17 | Noncognitivism and Epistemic Evaluations | 2019 | 5 |
| 18 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 20 | New Work For Certainty | 2020 | 3 |
About Bob Beddor
Bob Beddor is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 30 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (29 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers), Free Will and Agency (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (3 papers) and Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (274 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (144 citations), Family Practice (12 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (121 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (30 citations). Bob Beddor has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Carlotta Pavese, Simon Goldstein, Andy Egan, Paul Henne and Finnur Dellsén. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Studies, Australasian Journal of Philosophy and The Review of Symbolic Logic.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.